A lib help generate toml example
This crate provides the TomlExample trait and an accompanying derive macro.
Deriving TomlExample on a struct will provide to_example function help generate toml example file base documentation
- support
#[serde(default)],#[serde(default = "function_name")]attributes on both structs and struct fields (serdefeature, opt-in) - support
#[serde(rename)],#[serde(rename_all = "renaming rules")], the renaming rules can belowercase,UPPERCASE,PascalCase,camelCase,snake_case,SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE,kebab-case,SCREAMING-KEBAB-CASE - provide
#[toml_example(default)],#[toml_example(default = 0)],#[toml_example(default = "default_string")]attributes on struct fields #[toml_example(default)]is also supported as an outer attribute for structs- The order matter of attribute macro, if
#[serde(default = ..]and#[toml_example(default = ..)]existing at the same time with different value
use toml_example::TomlExample;
use serde::Deserialize;
/// Config is to arrange something or change the controls on a computer or other device
/// so that it can be used in a particular way
#[derive(TomlExample, Deserialize)]
struct Config {
/// Config.a should be a number
a: usize,
/// Config.b should be a string
b: String,
/// Optional Config.c is a number
c: Option<usize>,
/// Config.d is a list of number
d: Vec<usize>,
/// Config.e should be a number
#[serde(default = "default_int")]
e: usize,
/// Config.f should be a string
#[serde(default = "default_str")]
f: String,
/// Config.g should be a number
#[toml_example(default =7)]
g: usize,
/// Config.f should be a string
#[toml_example(default = "seven")]
h: String,
}
fn default_int() -> usize {
7
}
fn default_str() -> String {
"seven".into()
}
Config::to_toml_example("example.toml"); // write example to a file
let example = Config::toml_example();Toml example base on the docstring of each field
# Config is to arrange something or change the controls on a computer or other device
# so that it can be used in a particular way
# Config.a should be a number
a = 0
# Config.b should be a string
b = ""
# Optional Config.c is a number
# c = 0
# Config.d is a list of number
# d = [ 0, ]
# Config.e should be a number
e = 7
# Config.f should be a string
f = "seven"
# Config.g should be a number
g = 7
# Config.h should be a string
h = "seven"
The fields of a struct can inherit their defaults from the parent struct when the
#[toml_example(default)], #[serde(default)] or #[serde(default = "default_fn")]
attribute is set as an outer attribute of the parent struct:
use serde::Serialize;
use toml_example::TomlExample;
#[derive(TomlExample, Serialize)]
#[serde(default)]
struct Config {
/// Name of the theme to use
theme: String,
}
impl Default for Config {
fn default() -> Self {
Self {
theme: String::from("Dark"),
}
}
}
assert_eq!(Config::toml_example(),
r#"# Name of the theme to use
theme = "Dark"
"#);A nesting struct wrap with Option<T>, Vec<T>, HashMap<String, T>, BTreeMap<String, T> are handled.
Please add #[toml_example(nesting)], or #[toml_example(nesting = prefix)] on the field.
#[toml_example(nesting)]
/// Service with specific port
#[derive(TomlExample)]
struct Service {
/// port should be a number
#[toml_example(default = 80)]
port: usize,
}
#[derive(TomlExample)]
#[allow(dead_code)]
struct Node {
/// Services are running in the node
#[toml_example(default = http, nesting)]
services: HashMap<String, Service>,
}Node::toml_example() will be following string.
# Services are running in the node
# Service with specific port
[services.http]
# port should be a number
port = 80
Flattening means treating the fields of a nested struct as if they were defined directly in the wrapping struct.
#[derive(TomlExample)]
struct ItemWrapper {
#[toml_example(flatten, nesting)]
item: Item,
}
#[derive(TomlExample)]
struct Item {
value: String,
}
assert_eq!(ItemWrapper::toml_example(), Item::toml_example());This works with maps too!
#[derive(TomlExample, Deserialize)]
struct MainConfig {
#[serde(flatten)]
#[toml_example(nesting)]
nested: HashMap<String, ConfigItem>,
}
#[derive(TomlExample, Deserialize)]
struct ConfigItem {
#[toml_example(default = false)]
enabled: bool,
}
let example = MainConfig::toml_example();
assert!(toml::from_str::<MainConfig>(&example).is_ok());
println!("{example}");[example]
enabled = falseYou can also use fieldless enums, but you have to annotate them with #[toml_example(enum)] or
#[toml_example(is_enum)] if you mind the keyword highlight you likely get when writing "enum".
When annotating a field with #[toml_example(default)] it will use the Debug implementation.
However for non-TOML data types like enums, this does not work as the value needs to be treated as a string in TOML.
The #[toml_example(enum)] attribute just adds the needed quotes around the Debug implementation
and can be omitted if a custom Debug already includes those.
use toml_example::TomlExample;
#[derive(TomlExample)]
struct Config {
/// Config.priority is an enum
#[toml_example(enum, default)]
priority: Priority,
}
#[derive(Debug, Default)]
enum Priority {
#[default]
Important,
Trivial,
}
assert_eq!(Config::toml_example(),
r#"# Config.priority is an enum
priority = "Important"
"#)If you want an optional field become a required field in example,
place the #[toml_example(require)] on the field.
If you want to skip some field you can use #[toml_example(skip)],
the #[serde(skip)], #[serde(skip_deserializing)] also works.
use toml_example::TomlExample;
#[derive(TomlExample)]
struct Config {
/// Config.a is an optional number
#[toml_example(require)]
a: Option<usize>,
/// Config.b is an optional string
#[toml_example(require)]
b: Option<String>,
#[toml_example(require, default = "third")]
c: Option<String>,
#[toml_example(skip)]
d: usize,
}# Config.a is an optional number
a = 0
# Config.b is an optional string
b = ""
c = "third"
There are several common config file solutions: INI, JSON, YAML, TOML.
- INI is legacy and no nesting support, and the comment char is not designed at first, so some parser will use
;or#. - JSON does not support documentation. It is efficient for data exchange, but configuration files should include documentation, so it is not good for this use case.
- YAML is too greedy on covering derserialize issue, so it is too complex for a configuration and vulnerable, for example:
yambiguously stand for "y" or true- CVE-2019-11253
- TOML is good for now, and easy to write and read for human, that is a real need for configuration file.