Skip to content

Conversation

@borgja
Copy link
Collaborator

@borgja borgja commented Jan 11, 2026

Implements backslash line continuation as specified in README unimplemented features

README.md Outdated
### Extensions

- `.` may be used as PC in expressions
- ‘.’ may be used as PC
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting, this looks wrong.


### Unimplemented features

- `*` as PC in expressions
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also not sure why this was deleted, need to check on that.

@tmcintos
Copy link
Owner

tmcintos commented Jan 17, 2026

Sorry for the lack of clarity in the README, but this feature was an intentional omission due to the interactive line-oriented column-based editing/assembler mode.

Also, as written, it looks like this wouldn't work, as it only modifies the source entry routine but does not modify the assembly routine. The tests show more that one instruction per line (with continuation), which would also not be handled correctly since the assembler expects at most one instruction per line.

It is cool that the AI was to write mostly valid-looking 6800 assembly, though.

@tmcintos tmcintos closed this Jan 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants