-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.6k
Several optimization improvements, mainly for begin_borrow, load and load_borrow
#86113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+705
−296
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f67a310
Optimizer: split SimplifyBeginAndLoadBorrow.swift into SimplifyBeginB…
eeckstein ec8fe83
SimplifyBeginBorrow: small refactoring
eeckstein 2868663
Optimizer: handle debug_value in begin_borrow simplification
eeckstein 0271a4f
SimplifyBeginBorrow: ignore type-dependent operands when converting b…
eeckstein a250a30
SimplifyBeginBorrow: remove inner borrow scopes and other improvements
eeckstein ccc19e0
SemanticARCOpts: remove the BorrowScope optimization because this is …
eeckstein 439bda6
SIL: add `Type.isHeapObjectReferenceType`
eeckstein cc22290
OwnershipOptUtils: fix a wrong debug location when creating destroy_v…
eeckstein 9631d6c
SimplifyLoad/SimplifyLoadBorrow: add two peephole optimizations
eeckstein d5afd16
Optimizer: rename SimplifyMisc.swift -> SimplifyTypeValue.swift
eeckstein fb50158
SimplifyDestructure: convert `destructure_tuple`/`destructure_struct`…
eeckstein 7e61773
tests: enable SILOptimizer/copy-to-borrow-optimization.sil for all OSes
eeckstein 7ace2c5
CopyToBorrowOptimization: need to update borrowed-from instructions w…
eeckstein 0ac0cbd
SIL: fix operand ownership for `taskAddCancellationHandler` and `task…
eeckstein daa8850
LoadableByAddress: handle the `unchecked_bitwise_cast` instruction
eeckstein ceafe65
SILVerifier: print a readable error message when referencing an undef…
eeckstein e265eb0
SILVerifier: don't crash on verifier errors in the function header
eeckstein a06733b
SILCombine: disable `unchecked_bitwise_cast` -> `unchekced_ref_cast` …
eeckstein File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need a lexical check here? Can we remove an inner lexical borrow with an outer non lexical borrow?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The lexical check is only done in the mandatory pipeline. So, when running in the optimization pipeline, lexical begin_borrrows will be removed, anyway.
I don't think so (in the mandatory pipeline) because then the lexical flag gets lost and the outer, non-lexical, borrow scope could be removed as well