Skip to content

Conversation

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from eslutsky and vanhalenar January 5, 2026 08:37
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 5, 2026
@kasturinarra kasturinarra force-pushed the common-versions-update-release-4.22 branch from c292217 to 6b5127a Compare January 5, 2026 09:19
@kasturinarra kasturinarra marked this pull request as draft January 5, 2026 09:19
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 5, 2026
@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc

@kasturinarra kasturinarra force-pushed the common-versions-update-release-4.22 branch from 6b5127a to aa7be17 Compare January 5, 2026 09:55
@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc

@kasturinarra kasturinarra force-pushed the common-versions-update-release-4.22 branch from aa7be17 to 54316ca Compare January 5, 2026 10:20
@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc

@kasturinarra kasturinarra marked this pull request as ready for review January 5, 2026 11:52
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 5, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from agullon January 5, 2026 11:52
@kasturinarra kasturinarra changed the title Common versions update release 4.22 NO-ISSUE: Common versions update release 4.22 Jan 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jan 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@kasturinarra: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@agullon
Copy link
Contributor

agullon commented Jan 5, 2026

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 5, 2026
@agullon
Copy link
Contributor

agullon commented Jan 5, 2026

/lgtm cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 5, 2026
@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-cache
/test e2e-aws-tests-cache-arm

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@agullon
Copy link
Contributor

agullon commented Jan 5, 2026

/override e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm e2e-aws-tests-bootc

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 5, 2026

@agullon: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • e2e-aws-tests-bootc
  • e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm
  • e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic
  • e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-arm
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-cache
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-cache-arm
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-periodic
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-periodic-arm
  • ci/prow/images
  • ci/prow/security
  • ci/prow/test-unit
  • ci/prow/verify
  • ci/prow/verify-deps
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-arm
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-cache
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-cache-arm
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-periodic
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-periodic-arm
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-security
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-test-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-verify
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-verify-deps
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

Details

In response to this:

/override e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm e2e-aws-tests-bootc

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@agullon
Copy link
Contributor

agullon commented Jan 5, 2026

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic

because failing tests are because of out of date cache

@agullon
Copy link
Contributor

agullon commented Jan 5, 2026

/lgtm

@agullon
Copy link
Contributor

agullon commented Jan 5, 2026

/verified by CI

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Jan 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@agullon: This PR has been marked as verified by CI.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by CI

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 5, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 5, 2026

@agullon: Overrode contexts on behalf of agullon: ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc, ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm, ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic, ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic

because failing tests are because of out of date cache

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD df4283c and 2 for PR HEAD 54316ca in total

@agullon
Copy link
Contributor

agullon commented Jan 5, 2026

/retest

@kasturinarra kasturinarra force-pushed the common-versions-update-release-4.22 branch from 54316ca to fa42350 Compare January 6, 2026 06:27
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Jan 6, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 6, 2026
@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-cache
/test e2e-aws-tests-cache-arm

@kasturinarra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@agullon
Copy link
Contributor

agullon commented Jan 7, 2026

/lgtm

@agullon
Copy link
Contributor

agullon commented Jan 7, 2026

/verified by CI

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 7, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Jan 7, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@agullon: This PR has been marked as verified by CI.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by CI

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 7, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: agullon, kasturinarra

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [agullon,kasturinarra]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 7, 2026

@kasturinarra: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 0153093 into openshift:main Jan 7, 2026
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants