Need your feedback for research on evaluating automated conversion from Travis CI to GitHub Actions workflows

[nhossaincse]

I am doing research on evaluating automated conversion of CI configurations from Travis CI to GitHub Actions. As part of this study, a GitHub Actions workflow has been generated that aims to approximate the existing Travis CI configuration as closely as possible.
Even if you do not have plans to actually migrate to GitHub Actions, I would greatly appreciate it if you could give me some feedback on how well this migrated workflow reflects the original configuration. You may also give me your opinion in a five-point rating; it would be very helpful for the study. I just added the .yml file, and it has passed (green) on my end. Thank you.

[clarin-bot]

⛔ Snyk checks have failed. 37 issues have been found so far.

Status	Scanner	Critical	High	Medium	Low	Total (37)
⛔	Open Source Security	0	37	0	0	37 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

[nhossaincse]

Dear Authors,

I wanted to follow up on the PR.

I understand reviewing research PRs may not be a priority, but even brief feedback on how well the converted workflow captures your original Travis CI configuration would be incredibly helpful for my study. A simple 1-5 rating would be great and highly appreciated.

Thank you.

[nhossaincse]

Dear Authors,

Apologies for the additional follow up, and wanted to gently check in once more regarding this research PR.

If you have a moment, even brief feedback on whether the generated GitHub Actions workflow reflects your original Travis CI configuration would be extremely valuable for my study. A simple 1 to 5 rating (5 being the best) would be great and highly appreciated.

Thank you!