Process CI Selftests Failure #6258
Conversation
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughThe pull request updates a unit test in selftests/unit/utils/process.py. In test_can_sudo_oserror the mocked dependency is switched from Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Pre-merge checks❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (35)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @harvey0100, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a CI selftest failure by refining a unit test within Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request aims to fix a failing CI selftest by correcting a mock in test_can_sudo_oserror. While it correctly identifies that system should not be mocked, it replaces it with a mock for system_output, which is also incorrect. The can_sudo() function, when called without arguments, uses getoutput(). I've provided a critical comment with a suggestion to mock getoutput instead to ensure the test correctly verifies the intended behavior.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
selftests/unit/utils/process.py(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (48)
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:epel-9-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-ppc64le
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:centos-stream-9-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-aarch64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-42-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-43-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-aarch64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-43-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:epel-9-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:centos-stream-9-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-s390x
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-ppc64le
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-42-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-43-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-42-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:centos-stream-9-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-aarch64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-ppc64le
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:epel-9-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-s390x
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-ppc64le
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-43-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:centos-stream-9-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-s390x
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-aarch64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-42-x86_64
- GitHub Check: rpm-build:epel-9-x86_64
- GitHub Check: Egg task fedora:40
- GitHub Check: Podman spawner with 3rd party runner plugin
- GitHub Check: Egg task debian:11.0
- GitHub Check: Version task ubuntu:22.04
- GitHub Check: Fedora selftests
- GitHub Check: Version task debian:12.4
- GitHub Check: Version task ubuntu:24.04
- GitHub Check: Egg task ubuntu:22.04
- GitHub Check: Version task ubi:8.8
- GitHub Check: Version task fedora:41
- GitHub Check: Build Package (wheel/tarball) for Python 3.13
- GitHub Check: Windows with Python 3.13
- GitHub Check: Smokecheck on Linux with Python 3.13
- GitHub Check: Windows with Python 3.12
- GitHub Check: macOS with Python 3.11
- GitHub Check: Static checks
- GitHub Check: Code Coverage (3.11)
Mock system_output instead of system since can_sudo() without cmd calls system_output. Assisted-By: Claude 4.5 Sonnet Signed-off-by: Harvey Lynden <hlynden@redhat.com>
harvey0100
force-pushed
the
processfix
branch
from
7cbc8ae to
40249d0
Compare
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #6258 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 73.57% 73.58%
=======================================
Files 206 206
Lines 22497 22497
=======================================
+ Hits 16552 16554 +2
+ Misses 5945 5943 -2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from Review Requested
to Done 113
in Default project
2 participants
Mock system_output instead of system since can_sudo() without cmd calls system_output.
Assisted-By: Claude 4.5 Sonnet
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.