The black style fix #6257
The black style fix #6257
Conversation
The commit 7cc27dc introduced style issue which needs to be fixed Reference:7cc27dc Signed-off-by: Jan Richter <jarichte@redhat.com>
Summary of ChangesHello @richtja, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request resolves a code style inconsistency within the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes
Pre-merge checks✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (31)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The code changes in avocado/utils/cpu.py involved reformatting a dictionary entry within the get_x86_amd_zen function for improved readability, likely due to black formatting. The review comments acknowledge this readability improvement and highlight that the change also corrected the casing of some hexadecimal literals (e.g., 0x5f to 0x5F, 0xc0 to 0xC0, 0xcf to 0xCF) for better consistency. However, the reviewer noted a potential inconsistency in the original line's hexadecimal casing that was not fully resolved, suggesting that all hexadecimal literals should be consistently uppercase.
| 2: [(0x30, 0x4F), (0x60, 0x7F), (0x90, 0x91), (0xA0, 0xAF)], | ||
| }, | ||
| 0x19: {3: [(0x00, 0x0F), (0x20, 0x5F)], 4: [(0x10, 0x1F), (0x60, 0xAF)]}, | ||
| 0x1A: {5: [(0x00, 0x0F), (0x20, 0x2F), (0x40, 0x4F), (0x60, 0x7F)], 6: [(0x50, 0x5f), (0x80, 0xAF), (0xc0, 0xcf)]}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While applying black formatting has improved readability and fixed some inconsistencies in hexadecimal literal casing (e.g., 0x5f to 0x5F), there's still a mix of lowercase and uppercase hex literals in the original line. Specifically, 0xc0 and 0xcf were lowercase. The new code correctly makes them uppercase (0xC0, 0xCF), which is great for consistency. However, it seems black missed one: 0x5f was changed to 0x5F, but 0x5f is still present in the CODE BEFORE snippet. It seems there was a mix-up in the original line that was not fully corrected. For complete consistency, all hexadecimal literals should be uppercase. It appears the tool corrected most but not all. I've suggested a change to make all hex literals in this dictionary entry uppercase for consistency with the rest of the file.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #6257 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 73.54% 73.57% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 206 206
Lines 22497 22497
==========================================
+ Hits 16546 16553 +7
+ Misses 5951 5944 -7 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from Review Requested
to Done 113
in Default project
2 participants
The commit 7cc27dc introduced style issue which needs to be fixed
Reference: 7cc27dc
Summary by CodeRabbit
Note: This release contains internal code formatting updates only. No end-user visible changes.
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.