Skip to content

Conversation

@clebergnu
Copy link
Contributor

@clebergnu clebergnu commented Dec 12, 2025

Reference: avocado-framework/aautils#99

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated docstring declarations to improve accuracy. Removed outdated exception declarations from documentation without affecting any functional behavior or public interfaces.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
@mr-avocado mr-avocado bot moved this to Review Requested in Default project Dec 12, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @clebergnu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a minor documentation issue by removing an extraneous line from a docstring within the 'avocado/utils/gdb.py' module. The change specifically targets the 'cmd' function's documentation, ensuring its accuracy and conciseness without altering any functional code.

Highlights

  • Docstring Cleanup: Removed a duplicate or incorrect ':raises:' declaration from the 'cmd' function's docstring in 'avocado/utils/gdb.py', improving documentation accuracy.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Walkthrough

A docstring modification in avocado/utils/gdb.py removes the declared raises documentation from the GDBRemote.cmd method. Specifically, the documentation lines listing RetransmissionRequestedError and UnexpectedResponseError were deleted. No code logic, error handling, control flow, or function signatures were altered.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Single file modified with only docstring changes
  • No logic or behavior alterations
  • Pure documentation update with straightforward verification needed

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: removing a duplicate docstring line from the GDBRemote.cmd docstring in the gdb utility module.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ff9e2c and 7f5bdb6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • avocado/utils/gdb.py (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • avocado/utils/gdb.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (49)
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-42-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-aarch64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:epel-9-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-43-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:centos-stream-9-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-ppc64le
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-43-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:epel-9-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-aarch64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:centos-stream-9-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-42-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-s390x
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-aarch64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:epel-9-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-ppc64le
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-43-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-42-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:centos-stream-9-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-s390x
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-s390x
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-aarch64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:centos-stream-9-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-42-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-43-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:epel-9-x86_64
  • GitHub Check: rpm-build:fedora-41-ppc64le
  • GitHub Check: Smokecheck on Linux with Python 3.13
  • GitHub Check: Version task fedora:41
  • GitHub Check: Version task ubi:8.8
  • GitHub Check: Podman Egg task
  • GitHub Check: Fedora selftests
  • GitHub Check: Version task fedora:40
  • GitHub Check: Version task ubuntu:22.04
  • GitHub Check: Version task debian:12.4
  • GitHub Check: Windows with Python 3.12
  • GitHub Check: Windows with Python 3.13
  • GitHub Check: Smokecheck on Linux with Python 3.12
  • GitHub Check: Smokecheck on Linux with Python 3.10
  • GitHub Check: macOS with Python 3.11
  • GitHub Check: Static checks
  • GitHub Check: Code Coverage (3.11)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to remove a duplicate docstring line in avocado/utils/gdb.py. However, the change as presented removes documentation for the RetransmissionRequestedError and UnexpectedResponseError exceptions without providing a replacement. These exceptions can be raised by the cmd method, so removing their documentation makes the API contract unclear. My review includes a suggestion to correctly document all exceptions raised by the method.

:param expected_response: the (optional) response that is expected
as a response for the command sent
:type expected_response: str
:raises: RetransmissionRequestedError, UnexpectedResponseError

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This change removes the documentation for RetransmissionRequestedError and UnexpectedResponseError, but the function can still raise these exceptions. This makes the docstring incomplete and the API contract misleading.

While the pull request title suggests removing a duplicate, the provided diff context does not show any other documentation for these exceptions. To ensure the documentation is accurate, these exceptions should be documented, preferably with individual :raises tags for clarity.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 73.48%. Comparing base (4ff9e2c) to head (7f5bdb6).
⚠️ Report is 15 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6253      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.50%   73.48%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         206      206              
  Lines       22497    22497              
==========================================
- Hits        16536    16533       -3     
- Misses       5961     5964       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@richtja richtja merged commit 15dee3d into avocado-framework:master Dec 16, 2025
63 of 65 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Review Requested to Done 113 in Default project Dec 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done 113

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants