-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 362
Utils / gdb: remove duplicate docstring line #6253
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Summary of ChangesHello @clebergnu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a minor documentation issue by removing an extraneous line from a docstring within the 'avocado/utils/gdb.py' module. The change specifically targets the 'cmd' function's documentation, ensuring its accuracy and conciseness without altering any functional code. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
WalkthroughA docstring modification in Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes
Pre-merge checks✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (49)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request aims to remove a duplicate docstring line in avocado/utils/gdb.py. However, the change as presented removes documentation for the RetransmissionRequestedError and UnexpectedResponseError exceptions without providing a replacement. These exceptions can be raised by the cmd method, so removing their documentation makes the API contract unclear. My review includes a suggestion to correctly document all exceptions raised by the method.
| :param expected_response: the (optional) response that is expected | ||
| as a response for the command sent | ||
| :type expected_response: str | ||
| :raises: RetransmissionRequestedError, UnexpectedResponseError |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change removes the documentation for RetransmissionRequestedError and UnexpectedResponseError, but the function can still raise these exceptions. This makes the docstring incomplete and the API contract misleading.
While the pull request title suggests removing a duplicate, the provided diff context does not show any other documentation for these exceptions. To ensure the documentation is accurate, these exceptions should be documented, preferably with individual :raises tags for clarity.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #6253 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 73.50% 73.48% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 206 206
Lines 22497 22497
==========================================
- Hits 16536 16533 -3
- Misses 5961 5964 +3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Reference: avocado-framework/aautils#99
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.