Skip to content

Conversation

@leidwang
Copy link
Contributor

@leidwang leidwang commented Dec 15, 2025

ID: 4313,4314,4315

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added support for VirtioSocket driver component, extending compatibility with available virtio drivers.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

ID: 4313,4314,4315

Signed-off-by: Leidong Wang <leidwang@redhat.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 15, 2025

Walkthrough

A new entry for the VirtIO Socket driver ("viosock": "VirtioSocket") is added to the DRIVER_SVC_MAP dictionary in the virtio_win.py utility module. This is a purely additive change that extends the set of recognized virtio service components without modifying existing entries or control flow.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Verify that the key-value pair "viosock": "VirtioSocket" matches the intended driver mapping convention
  • Confirm the entry follows the existing naming pattern established in the dictionary

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately summarizes the main change: adding a vsock service map entry to DRIVER_SVC_MAP in the virtio-win module.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3c00fa8 and 8c3e5c6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • virttest/utils_windows/virtio_win.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Static checks

"vioser": "VirtioSerial",
"viofs": "VirtioFsDrv",
"vioinput": "VirtioInput",
"viosock": "VirtioSocket",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all usages of DRIVER_SVC_MAP and references to viosock

# Find usages of DRIVER_SVC_MAP
echo "=== Usages of DRIVER_SVC_MAP ==="
rg -n -C3 "DRIVER_SVC_MAP" --type=py

# Find any existing references to viosock or VirtioSocket
echo -e "\n=== Existing references to viosock ==="
rg -n -i "viosock|virtiosocket" --type=py

Repository: avocado-framework/avocado-vt

Length of output: 1362


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for documentation, tests, or comments that reference viosock service

# Look for viosock in test files and documentation
echo "=== Search for viosock in test files ==="
rg -n "viosock" -A 5 -B 5 --type=py

# Look for service name references or Windows driver info
echo -e "\n=== Look for SERVICE or Windows driver patterns ==="
rg -n "VirtioSocket|VirtRng|VirtioSerial|VirtioFsDrv|VirtioInput" --type=py

# Check git history or comments about viosock
echo -e "\n=== Check all files mentioning virtio or svc ==="
rg -n "viosock|VirtioSocket" . --type=py -A 2 -B 2

Repository: avocado-framework/avocado-vt

Length of output: 4661


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for documentation or comments about Windows service names

# Check README or documentation files
echo "=== Look for README or documentation files ==="
find . -type f \( -name "README*" -o -name "*.md" -o -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.rst" \) | head -20

# Check for any comments or docstrings mentioning viosock
echo -e "\n=== Check for comments or docstrings in virtio_win.py ==="
head -100 virttest/utils_windows/virtio_win.py

# Look for QEMU or Windows documentation references
echo -e "\n=== Look for Windows driver or service references ==="
rg -n "service|SERVICE|Service" virttest/utils_windows/virtio_win.py -A 3 -B 3

# Check for any configuration or mapping files
echo -e "\n=== Check for config files that might reference service names ==="
find . -name "*.cfg" -o -name "*.conf" -o -name "*.yaml" -o -name "*.json" | grep -v node_modules | head -20

Repository: avocado-framework/avocado-vt

Length of output: 4108


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the Windows virtio installation documentation
cat ./docs/source/InstallWinVirtio.rst | head -200

Repository: avocado-framework/avocado-vt

Length of output: 8190


LGTM! Verify the Windows service name for viosock.

The addition follows the existing pattern correctly and is backward compatible. The code in utils_test/qemu/__init__.py safely handles new entries with a fallback pattern, so this new entry won't cause issues. However, please verify that "VirtioSocket" is the correct Windows service name for the viosock driver according to official QEMU/Windows virtio driver documentation.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In virttest/utils_windows/virtio_win.py around line 23, the mapping adds
"viosock": "VirtioSocket" but the review requests you verify the actual Windows
service name for the viosock driver; confirm the official QEMU/Windows virtio
driver docs or inspect a Windows guest with the driver installed to determine
the correct service display/name (e.g., "viosock" vs "VirtioSocket" or another
exact string) and if different, update this mapping to the exact canonical
service name used by Windows; ensure casing and spacing match the OS service
entry and add a brief inline comment referencing the doc/source you used for
verification.

@leidwang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @xiagao Could you please review this PR?Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

@xiagao xiagao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants