Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 20, 2025. It is now read-only.

arfc/2022-seifert-ms

Repository files navigation

Seifert Master Thesis

General Concept(s)

Discussion of Serpent2 flow functionality, possible uses, pitfalls, and workarounds. How it differs from batch-wise reprocessing. Discuss usefulness over batchwise (Xe-135 in batchwise is not removed until after depletion, meaning more captures occur by Xe-135 than would have happened if removed continuously).

Use Serpent2 build-in flows and binary restarts to create "piping" where material decays naturally while not in core. How does this differ from MSBR analysis as a single unit geometry analyzed in SaltProc where piping volume is included in core volume? Does it improve result by providing more accuracy to location of DNP decay? Does a smaller "mesh" of materials allow for better results?

Thesis Sections

  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Literature Review
    • Accounting for material decay in piping
    • Serpent2 continuous removal
    • Serpent2 restart scripts
    • Methods of tracking DNPs in MSRs
      • GenFOAM?
      • Moltres?
    • Batchwise removal methods in Serpent2
    • SaltProc
    • MSBR
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Conclusions

Results to Discuss

  • Explanation of flow functionality
  • Discussion of cyclic flow effects (breaks depletion); workarounds
  • Explanation of why type 1 approximations necessary given removal fraction
  • Type 1 cycle-time-decay approximation
  • Type 1 linear generation approximation
  • Type 2 different approaches and non-physicality
  • Discussion of when each type could be used (pros/cons)

Results to be Generated

  • Isotope-importance based type 1 MSBR approximation
  • Difference plots along with mass plots for type 1 approximations
  • N-steps for different type 1 approximations
  • Type 1 approximations at different starting positions (BOC vs SS)
  • Implementation of Serpent2 built-in flows in SaltProc
  • Separation of MSBR into core and piping material difference in results
    • Difference from single-material model
    • Discuss validty of slug flow approximation (no mixing of materials)
    • DNP groups SS locations
    • Difference in neutronic parameters
    • Mesh refinement analysis (cost vs accuracy)
    • Analysis of separate parts of the core

Possible Things to Add

  • Neutronics parameters for different type 1 approximations
  • Comparison of MSBR with SaltProc, subdivided materials, and with CFD

About

Luke Seifert's thesis repository

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Contributors 2

  •  
  •