-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Suggestion to removal further minor inconsistencies #15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The software pynxtools that other build it, therefore more leaning towards the passive interpretation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok
| site_description: | | ||
| The documentation for the {{cookiecutter.__package_name}} plugin. | ||
| site_author: The FAIRmat authors | ||
| site_author: The NOMAD Authors |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That flabbergasted me, typically in many other places in pynxtools official plugins we use the "NOMAD" authors, also in the license, people sure need to change this is they dont develop an official fairmat plugin
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably, we can just go with {{cookiecutter.author_name}}, then it is auto-adjusted?
| site_author: The NOMAD Authors | |
| site_author: {{cookiecutter.author_name}} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For pytest.yml we run a matrix for pylint we havent done this yet but makes sense
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wanted to avoid this because ruff anyway checks the pyproject file for the allowed python version and adjusts its behavior accordingly. An example is that once we dropped python<3.10, the default notation in ruff automatically changed from Optional[str] to str | None, which was introduced in python 3.10. So I think it's fine to use a single python version here.
lukaspie
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a couple suggestions
No description provided.