Skip to content

Conversation

@vLuckyyy
Copy link
Member

@vLuckyyy vLuckyyy commented Jan 7, 2026

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @vLuckyyy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a significant improvement to how chat formats are retrieved based on a player's rank. By implementing case-insensitive matching for rank names, it makes the system more robust and user-friendly, preventing issues that could arise from inconsistent casing in rank configurations. The change primarily involves modifying the format lookup logic and updating relevant documentation.

Highlights

  • Case-Insensitive Rank Matching: The rank name lookup for chat formats is now case-insensitive, allowing 'Elite', 'elite', or 'ELITE' to all match the same configured format. This enhances flexibility and user experience by removing strict case requirements.
  • Improved getRawFormat Logic: The getRawFormat method in PluginConfig.java has been refactored to explicitly handle null rank inputs and perform a case-insensitive comparison when searching for a matching format in the configuration map.
  • Configuration Comment Update: The configuration file comments have been updated to clearly state that rank name matching is now case-insensitive, guiding users on the new behavior.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly implements case-insensitive matching for rank formats, which is a good improvement. However, the current implementation introduces a performance issue by iterating through all formats for every chat message. I've provided a suggestion to optimize this by using a cached, case-insensitive map for lookups, which restores efficient lookups for format retrieval.

Comment on lines 92 to 106
public String getRawFormat(String rank) {
return this.format.getOrDefault(rank, this.defaultFormat);
if (rank == null) {
return this.defaultFormat;
}

String normalizedRank = rank.toLowerCase();

for (Map.Entry<String, String> entry : this.format.entrySet()) {
if (entry.getKey().toLowerCase().equals(normalizedRank)) {
return entry.getValue();
}
}

return this.defaultFormat;
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

This implementation correctly provides case-insensitive matching, but it introduces a performance regression. The getRawFormat method now iterates through all configured formats for every call, resulting in an O(N) complexity. Since this method is likely called for every chat message, this can impact server performance.

A more efficient approach is to use a case-insensitive map for lookups. You can create a cached map that is built once and then reused for fast lookups.

First, add a transient field for the cache to the PluginConfig class:

private transient java.util.Map<String, String> lowerCaseFormatCache;

Then, update getRawFormat to use this lazy-initialized cache. This will build the cache on the first call and provide fast lookups for all subsequent calls.

Note: If your plugin supports configuration hot-reloading, ensure you invalidate this cache (by setting lowerCaseFormatCache = null;) when the configuration is reloaded to prevent serving stale data.

    public String getRawFormat(String rank) {
        if (this.lowerCaseFormatCache == null) {
            this.lowerCaseFormatCache = new java.util.TreeMap<>(String.CASE_INSENSITIVE_ORDER);
            this.lowerCaseFormatCache.putAll(this.format);
        }

        if (rank == null) {
            return this.defaultFormat;
        }

        return this.lowerCaseFormatCache.getOrDefault(rank, this.defaultFormat);
    }

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants