Skip to content

Conversation

@ingatellent
Copy link
Contributor

@ingatellent ingatellent commented Dec 29, 2025

Here are some suggested changes for the bluetooth page with information on how to avoid "random" disconnects (they are actually not random at all, but completely deterministic and expected).

Copy link
Contributor

@Eeems Eeems left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

restructured text doesn't like to render properly when codeblocks don't have a whitespace before them, but wont raise a warning or exception. I haven't tested to see if this renders properly as-is, but it's probably best to be consistent. There was also a spelling mistake that spellcheck made me aware of.

ingatellent and others added 4 commits December 29, 2025 20:21
Co-authored-by: Nathaniel van Diepen <Eeems@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nathaniel van Diepen <Eeems@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nathaniel van Diepen <Eeems@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nathaniel van Diepen <Eeems@users.noreply.github.com>
@Eeems
Copy link
Contributor

Eeems commented Jan 1, 2026

You've got this marked as a draft still, was there anything else it was waiting on?

@ingatellent
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm still testing the udev solution out in practice - there are sometimes disconnects with this solution anyway, I'm trying to confirm that this is the external device which disconnects (and then adding information on that).
I'm also considering adding a note about the fact that bluetooth keypresses in xochitl does not reset the sleep/slumber timer - which means that the device can go to sleep while your are actively interacting with it (but this is also true for the type folio key events, so might not belong here).
Finally I'm considering adding information about csl power -w wakelock_name:300000 which can put a wakelock with a timeout (which might be better for battery life) - but that also seems like it would fit best on a page with csl information.

I guess these things could be a separate PR except for the first comment.

@ingatellent ingatellent marked this pull request as ready for review January 4, 2026 14:47
@ingatellent
Copy link
Contributor Author

I haven't got more time to dig deeper the next couple of weeks, so I think this could be merged now.

@Eeems Eeems merged commit d9e268e into Eeems-Org:main Jan 4, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants