Break out architecture framework descriptions?

[leahbannon]

Should we break these out into individual pages? http://project-interoperability.github.io/architecture-frameworks/

[cathrynmarcuse]

It might be helpful, so that we can link to the frameworks separately in the text. If TOGAF is mentioned in the text somewhere, it would be helpful to link to it directly instead of asking the user to scroll all the way to the bottom.

Is there another reason to do it?

[MEKennedy79]

You could, but couldn't you also put a link that would direct you to that specific part of the page without having to break them out into individual documents? It is kind of handy to have all of them together. That way when one goes the TOGAF explaination they are able to see the others right there.

[dsofranac]

These should be on the same page in order for someone unfamiliar with another framework to have some context. If they are not on the same page the user would not to easily compare the frameworks for usage.

[leahbannon]

Ok. Are there any links we can offer for people interested in learning more about these frameworks?

[dsofranac]

Here is the link to DoDAF: http://dodcio.defense.gov/dodaf20.aspx . Are you going to put this in paragraph on DoDAF? If so, I think it is a good idea. Will try to get links for the other framework.

[dsofranac]

Here are some more links:
FEAF (Common Approach): http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/egov_docs/common_approach_to_federal_ea.pdf
GRA: https://it.ojp.gov/GRA
TOGAF (The Open Group Architecture Framework): http://www.opengroup.org/togaf/
IC PAG (Intelligence Community Program Architecture Guide): Still looking for the link…