Skip to content

[BUG] Zero-sequence modelling of three-winding transformer #1209

@TonyXiang8787

Description

@TonyXiang8787

We have two issues which need fix for three-winding transformer

Separate attributes for zero-sequence magnetization

In #1197, the zero-sequence modelling of two-winding transformer has been improved. User can now specify zero-sequence magnetization current/loss to give detailed zero-sequence modelling. This is espacially neede for Yyn tranformers.

We need to implement similar things for three-winding transformer.

Disappeared delta-winding

In the modelling we divide three-winding transformer to three two-winding tranformers with an aritificial node. We always use node_1 as the aritificial YNyn transformer. This is correct for positive and negative sequence. But for zero-sequence the current implementation is not correct.

Given a Y/yn/delta transformer, the equivalant modelling will be.

node_1 ---YN/yn---- artificial_node ---Y/yn-----  node_2
                             |
                             |
                          Y/delta--- node_3

In this modelling, node_2 will not have a delta winding at primary side to allow zero-sequence current to circulate. However, this is not the reality. All three windings are bundle together in the iron core, and the delta-winding from node_3 should be able to provide proper zero-sequence circulation.

The model has to be adjusted to not to blindly use node_1 to create the aritificial YNyn transformer. If there is a delta-winding in the configuration, the aritificial YNyn transformer should be created from the delta-winding side.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Status

    No status

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions